It is currently 27 Sep 2020, 01:29
My Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Two relatively recent independent developments stand behind

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
2 KUDOS received
Founder
Founder
User avatar
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 13367
Followers: 290

Kudos [?]: 3398 [2] , given: 12223

CAT Tests
Two relatively recent independent developments stand behind [#permalink] New post 14 Feb 2020, 04:04
2
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
00:00

Question Stats:

55% (10:33) correct 44% (11:24) wrong based on 18 sessions
Kudos for the right answer and explanation

Two relatively recent independent developments stand behind the current major research effort on nitrogen fixation, the process by which bacteria symbiotically render leguminous plants independent of nitrogen fertilizer. The one development has been the rapid, sustained increase in the price of nitrogen fertilizer. The other development has been the rapid growth of knowledge of and technical sophistication in genetic engineering. Fertilizer prices, largely tied to the price of natural gas, huge amounts of which go into the manufacture of fertilizer, will continue to represent an enormous and escalating economic burden on modern agriculture, spurring the search for alternatives to synthetic fertilizers. And genetic engineering is just the sort of fundamental breakthrough that opens up prospects of wholly novel alternatives. One such novel idea is that of inserting into the chromosomes of plants discrete genes that are not a part of the plants' natural constitution: specifically, the idea of inserting into nonleguminous plants the genes if they can be identified and isolated, that fit the leguminous plants to be hosts for nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Hence, intensified research on legumes.

Nitrogen fixation is a process in which certain bacteria use atmospheric nitrogen gas, which green plants cannot directly utilize, to produce ammonia, a nitrogen compound plants can use. It is one of nature's great ironies that the availability of nitrogen in the soil frequently sets an upper limit on plant growth even though the plants' leave are bathed in a sea of nitrogen gas. The leguminous plants - among them crop plants such as soybeans, peas, alfalfa, and clover - have solved the nitrogen supply problem by entering into a symbiotic relationship with the bacterial genus Rhizobium; as a matter of fact, there is a specific strain of Rhizobium for each species of legume. The host plant supplies the bacteria with food and protected habitat and receives surplus ammonia in exchange. Hence, legumes can thrive in nitrogen-depleted soil.

Unfortunately, most of the major food crops - including maize, wheat, rice, and potatoes - cannot. On the contrary, many of the high-yielding hybrid varieties of these food crops bred during the Green Revolution of the 1960's were selected specifically to give high yields in response to generous applications of nitrogen fertilizer. This poses an additional, formidable challenge to plant geneticists: they must work on enhancing fixation within the existing symbioses. Unless they succeed, the yield gains of the Green Revolution will be largely lost even if the genes in legumes that equip those plants to enter into a symbiosis with nitrogen fixers are identified and isolated, and even if the transfer of those gene complexes, once they are found, becomes possible. The overall task looks forbidding, but the stakes are too high not to undertake it.
20. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) expose the fragile nature of the foundations on which the high yields of modern agriculture rest
(B) argue that genetic engineering promises to lead to even higher yields than are achievable with synthetic fertilizers
(C) argue that the capacity for nitrogen-fixing symbioses is transferable to nonleguminous plants
(D) explain the reasons for and the objectives of current research on nitrogen-fixing symbioses
(E) describe the nature of the genes that regulate the symbiosis between legumes and certain bacteria

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
D


21. According to the passage, there is currently no strain of Rhizobium that can enter into a symbiosis with

(A) alfalfa
(B) clover
(C) maize
(D) peas
(E) soybeans

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
C


22. The passage implies that which of the following is true of the bacterial genus Rhizobium?

(A) Rhizobium bacteria are found primarily in nitrogen-depleted soils.
(B) Some strains of Rhizobium are not capable of entering into a symbiosis with any plant.
(C) Newly bred varieties of legumes cannot be hosts to any strain of Rhizobium.
(D) Rhizobium bacteria cannot survive outside the protected habitat provided by host plants.
(E) Rhizobium bacteria produce some ammonia for their own purposes.

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
E


23. It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following was the most influential factor in bringing about intensified research on nitrogen fixation?

(A) The high yields of the Green Revolution
(B) The persistent upward surge in natural gas prices
(C) The variety of Rhizobium strains
(D) The mechanization of modern agriculture
(E) The environmental ill effects of synthetic fertilizers

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
B


24. Which of the following situations is most closely analogous to the situation described by the author as one of nature's great ironies?

(A) That of a fanner whose crops have failed because the normal midseason rains did not materialize and no preparations for irrigation had been made
(B) That of a long-distance runner who loses a marathon race because of a wrong turn that cost him twenty seconds
(C) That of shipwrecked sailors at sea in a lifeboat, with one flask of drinking water to share among them
(D) That of a motorist who runs out of gas a mere five miles from the nearest gas station .
(E) That of travelers who want to reach their destination as fast and as cheaply as possible, but find that cost increases as travel speed increases

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
C


25. According to the passage, the ultimate goal of the current research on nitrogen fixation is to develop

(A) strains of Rhizobium that can enter into symbioses with existing varieties of wheat,rice, and other nonlegumes
(B) strains of Rhizobium that produce more ammonia for leguminous host plants than do any of the strains presently known
(C) varieties of wheat, rice, and other nonlegumes that yield as much as do existing varieties, but require less nitrogen
(D) varieties of wheat, rice, and other nonlegumes that maintain an adequate symbiotic relationship with nitrogen-fixing bacteria and produce high yields
(E) high-yielding varieties of wheat, rice, and other nonlegumes that are genetically equipped to fix nitrogen from the air without the aid of bacteria

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
D


26. The author regards the research program under discussion as

(A) original and extensive but ill-defined as to method
(B) necessary and ambitious but vulnerable to failure
(C) cogent and worthwhile but severely underfunded
(D) prohibitively expensive but conceptually elegant
(E) theoretically fascinating but practically useless

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
B


27. Most nearly parallel, in its fundamental approach, to the research program described in the passage would be a program designed to

(A) achieve greater frost resistance in frost-tender food plants by means of selective breeding, thereby expanding those plants' area of cultivation
(B) achieve greater yields from food plants by interplanting crop plants that are mutually beneficial
(C) find inexpensive and abundant natural substances that could, without reducing yields, be substituted for expensive synthetic fertilizers
(D) change the genetic makeup of food plants that cannot live in water with high salinity, using genes from plants adapted to saltwater
(E) develop, through genetic engineering, a genetic configuration for the major food plants that improve the storage characteristics of the edible portion of the plants

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
D


_________________

Need Practice? 20 Free GRE Quant Tests available for free with 20 Kudos
GRE Prep Club Members of the Month: Each member of the month will get three months free access of GRE Prep Club tests.

Founder
Founder
User avatar
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 13367
Followers: 290

Kudos [?]: 3398 [0], given: 12223

CAT Tests
Re: Two relatively recent independent developments stand behind [#permalink] New post 22 Apr 2020, 14:45
Expert's post

+1 kudos to all the posts containing proper explanations


_________________

Need Practice? 20 Free GRE Quant Tests available for free with 20 Kudos
GRE Prep Club Members of the Month: Each member of the month will get three months free access of GRE Prep Club tests.

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
Joined: 01 Jan 2020
Posts: 114
Concentration: Marketing
Schools: Copenhagen Business School - Class of 2022
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 59 [1] , given: 46

Re: Two relatively recent independent developments stand behind [#permalink] New post 24 Apr 2020, 13:19
1
This post received
KUDOS
11 min (still above the threshold by much tho)

6/8

The 22nd question must be one of the nicest and best structured questions that I have seen insofar from ETS

I happened to miss it.

Now the trick is that in the text is says surplus, which should be immediately indicative that the bacteria is consuming it as well!
I guess that is something that one misses easily tho.
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Apr 2020
Posts: 90
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 36 [1] , given: 22

Re: Two relatively recent independent developments stand behind [#permalink] New post 04 May 2020, 23:51
1
This post received
KUDOS
bubidag wrote:
11 min (still above the threshold by much tho)

6/8

The 22nd question must be one of the nicest and best structured questions that I have seen insofar from ETS

I happened to miss it.

Now the trick is that in the text is says surplus, which should be immediately indicative that the bacteria is consuming it as well!
I guess that is something that one misses easily tho.


I had the hold on exactly the word "surplus", but I discredited option E because I interpreted the sentence as the bacteria gives ALL ITS NITROGEN, INCLUDING THE SURPLUS to the legumes. Does surplus inherently mean that the noun associated with it will be using it for its own purpose?

Can someone explain Q25?

I was initially torn between C and E, then the 2nd paragraph made me confused and I thought the research was based on the bacteria and so chose B. The answer was D.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 01 May 2020
Posts: 31
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 13

Re: Two relatively recent independent developments stand behind [#permalink] New post 09 May 2020, 19:26
can someone explain why in the 22nd question option b and c are incorrect.
also the 25th and 27th
2 KUDOS received
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 03 Dec 2019
Posts: 343
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 358 [2] , given: 52

Re: Two relatively recent independent developments stand behind [#permalink] New post 10 May 2020, 06:35
2
This post received
KUDOS
Zohair123 wrote:
bubidag wrote:
11 min (still above the threshold by much tho)

6/8

The 22nd question must be one of the nicest and best structured questions that I have seen insofar from ETS

I happened to miss it.

Now the trick is that in the text is says surplus, which should be immediately indicative that the bacteria is consuming it as well!
I guess that is something that one misses easily tho.


I had the hold on exactly the word "surplus", but I discredited option E because I interpreted the sentence as the bacteria gives ALL ITS NITROGEN, INCLUDING THE SURPLUS to the legumes. Does surplus inherently mean that the noun associated with it will be using it for its own purpose?

Can someone explain Q25?

I was initially torn between C and E, then the 2nd paragraph made me confused and I thought the research was based on the bacteria and so chose B. The answer was D.



25. According to the passage, the ultimate goal of the current research on nitrogen fixation is to develop

(A) strains of Rhizobium that can enter into symbioses with existing varieties of wheat,rice, and other nonlegumes
(B) strains of Rhizobium that produce more ammonia for leguminous host plants than do any of the strains presently known
(C) varieties of wheat, rice, and other nonlegumes that yield as much as do existing varieties, but require less nitrogen
(D) varieties of wheat, rice, and other nonlegumes that maintain an adequate symbiotic relationship with nitrogen-fixing bacteria and produce high yields
(E) high-yielding varieties of wheat, rice, and other nonlegumes that are genetically equipped to fix nitrogen from the air without the aid of bacteria


Unfortunately, most of the major food crops - including maize, wheat, rice, and potatoes - cannot. On the contrary, many of the high-yielding hybrid varieties of these food crops bred during the Green Revolution of the 1960's were selected specifically to give high yields in response to generous applications of nitrogen fertilizer.This poses an additional, formidable challenge to plant geneticists: they must work on enhancing fixation within the existing symbioses.

The above section of the passage tells you that most of the major food crops are unable to perform nitrogen fixation. However, they were selected during the revolution to produce high yields. Since they are unable to perform the necessary fixation, more research is needed to make them susceptible to nitrogen fixation so that they can produce high yields.

Only D matches with the idea.

E is wrong because bacteria is crucial to the fixation process.

C is wrong because the section says they need to focus on enhancing fixation which would require more nitrogen.

Hope it is clearer now.
_________________

Thanks and Regards,

theBrahmaTiger

If you found this post useful, please let me know by pressing the Kudos Button


Rules for Posting

Got 20 Kudos? You can get Free GRE Prep Club Tests

GRE Prep Club Members of the Month:TOP 10 members of the month with highest kudos receive access to 3 months GRE Prep Club tests

1 KUDOS received
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 03 Dec 2019
Posts: 343
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 358 [1] , given: 52

Re: Two relatively recent independent developments stand behind [#permalink] New post 10 May 2020, 06:47
1
This post received
KUDOS
safana wrote:
can someone explain why in the 22nd question option b and c are incorrect.
also the 25th and 27th


22) B is wrong because the passage doesn't say that some strains of the bacteria are not capable to entering symbiosis. Instead, it says as a matter of fact, there is a specific strain of Rhizobium for each species of legume.

25) read my explanation above

27) The passage talks about how non legumes plants can be injected with the genetically modified genes that are found in legumes. The reason is that non-legumes are unable to perform nitrogen-fixation on their own.

Having this concept in mind, D matches with the idea. Because, it says changing the genes of plants (non-legumes) that cannot live in saline water, using genes of plants that are susceptible to salinity (legumes).

Let me know if you have any questions.
_________________

Thanks and Regards,

theBrahmaTiger

If you found this post useful, please let me know by pressing the Kudos Button


Rules for Posting

Got 20 Kudos? You can get Free GRE Prep Club Tests

GRE Prep Club Members of the Month:TOP 10 members of the month with highest kudos receive access to 3 months GRE Prep Club tests

1 KUDOS received
Moderator
Moderator
Joined: 19 May 2020
Posts: 74
GRE 1: Q160 V163
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 69 [1] , given: 48

Re: Two relatively recent independent developments stand behind [#permalink] New post 26 May 2020, 18:49
1
This post received
KUDOS
20. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(D) explain the reasons for and the objectives of current research on nitrogen-fixing symbioses-
correct- this is the broad idea behind writing the passage.

21. According to the passage, there is currently no strain of Rhizobium that can enter into a symbiosis with
(C) maize
correct- The leguminous plants... such as soybeans, peas, alfalfa, and clover - have solved the nitrogen supply problem

22. The passage implies that which of the following is true of the bacterial genus Rhizobium?

(E) Rhizobium bacteria produce some ammonia for their own purposes.
correct- the host plant.... receives surplus ammonia in exchange

23. It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following was the most influential factor in bringing about intensified research on nitrogen fixation?

(B) The persistent upward surge in natural gas prices
correct- Para 1-

24. Which of the following situations is most closely analogous to the situation described by the author as one of nature's great ironies?

(C) That of shipwrecked sailors at sea in a lifeboat, with one flask of drinking water to share among them
correct- Abundance of something which you can not utilize unless you have the mechanism to use it


25. According to the passage, the ultimate goal of the current research on nitrogen fixation is to develop
POE
(D) varieties of wheat, rice, and other nonlegumes that maintain an adequate symbiotic relationship with nitrogen-fixing bacteria and produce high yields
Correct
(E) high-yielding varieties of wheat, rice, and other nonlegumes that are genetically equipped to fix nitrogen from the air without the aid of bacteria
incorrect- without the aid of bacteria

26. The author regards the research program under discussion as

(B) necessary and ambitious but vulnerable to failure
correct- The overall task looks forbidding, but the stakes are too high not to undertake it.

27. Most nearly parallel, in its fundamental approach, to the research program described in the passage would be a program designed to

(D) change the genetic makeup of food plants that cannot live in water with high salinity, using genes from plants adapted to saltwater
correct- comparable to taking genes from legumes and using for non-legumes
(E) develop, through genetic engineering, a genetic configuration for the major food plants that
improve the storage characteristics of the edible portion of the plants
close but incorrect- D is more suitable.
Re: Two relatively recent independent developments stand behind   [#permalink] 26 May 2020, 18:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Two relatively recent independent developments stand behind

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GRE Prep Club Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GRE Prep Club Rules| Contact

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group

Kindly note that the GRE® test is a registered trademark of the Educational Testing Service®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by ETS®.