It is currently 21 Mar 2019, 18:46

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# The overall operating costs borne by many small farmers are

 Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:
Moderator
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 5859
Followers: 94

Kudos [?]: 1145 [0], given: 5455

The overall operating costs borne by many small farmers are [#permalink]  16 Feb 2019, 11:28
Expert's post
00:00

Question Stats:

66% (01:17) correct 33% (02:37) wrong based on 6 sessions
The overall operating costs borne by many small farmers are reduced when the farmers eliminate expensive commercial chemical fertilizers and pesticides in favor of crop rotation and the twice-yearly use of manure as fertilizer. Therefore, large farmers should adopt the same measures. They will then realize even greater total savings than do the small farmers.

The argument-above assumes that

(A) it is more cost-effective for small farmers to eliminate the use of commercial fertilizers and pesticides than it is for large farmers to do so
(B) a sufficient amount of manure will be available for the fields of large farmers
(C) large fanners would not realize similar cost benefits by using treated sewage sludge instead of commercial chemical fertilizers
(D) large fanners generally look to small farmers for innovative ways of increasing crop yields or reducing operating costs
(E) the smaller the farm, the more control the farmer has over operating costs
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________
Manager
Joined: 04 Feb 2019
Posts: 168
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 56 [1] , given: 0

Re: The overall operating costs borne by many small farmers are [#permalink]  21 Feb 2019, 20:49
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
(A) The argument says that large farmers will save even more. So it is more cost effective for large farmers, not small farmers.

(B) This has to be true in order for the argument to be valid. Hence, it is an assumption. If there was not enough manure, then the large farms could not reap the same benefits as the small farms.

(C) Assuming that "treated sewage sludge" is the same as manure, the argument says that large farms will realize similar cost benefits.

(D) Whether or not large farms look to small farms for advice does not affect whether or not large farms will save any money in this specific instance.

(E) Control is not relevant to this argument. We only care about how high or low the operating costs are, not who or what is responsible for them.
Re: The overall operating costs borne by many small farmers are   [#permalink] 21 Feb 2019, 20:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The overall operating costs borne by many small farmers are

 Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group Kindly note that the GRE® test is a registered trademark of the Educational Testing Service®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by ETS®.