It is currently 19 Feb 2020, 08:49
My Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

The first mention of slavery in the statutes of the English

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
3 KUDOS received
Founder
Founder
User avatar
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 9652
Followers: 199

Kudos [?]: 2366 [3] , given: 9155

CAT Tests
The first mention of slavery in the statutes of the English [#permalink] New post 19 Jun 2019, 10:59
3
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
00:00

Question Stats:

33% (14:28) correct 66% (17:17) wrong based on 12 sessions
The first mention of slavery in the statutes of the English colonies of North America does not occur until after 1660-some forty years after the importation of the first Black people. Lest we think that slavery existed in fact before it did in law, Oscar and Mary Handlin assure us that the status of Black people down to the 1660's was that of servants. A critique of the Handlins' interpretation of why legal slavery did not appear until the 1660's suggests that assumptions about the relation between slavery and racial prejudice should be reexamined and that explanations for the different treatment of Black slaves in North and South America should be expanded.

The Handlins explain the appearance of legal slavery by arguing that, during the 1660's, the position of White servants was improving relative to that of Black servants. Thus, the Handlins contend, Black and White servants heretofore treated alike, each attained a different status. There are, however, important objections to this argument. First, the Handlins cannot adequate!y demonstrate that the White servant's position was improving during and after the 1660's; several acts of the Maryland and Virginia legislatures indicate otherwise. Another flaw in the Handlins' interpretation is their assumption that prior to the establishment of legal slavery there was no discrimination against Black people. It is true that before the 1660's Black people were rarely called slaves. But this should not overshadow evidence from the 1630's on that points to racial discrimination without using the term slavery. Such discrimination sometimes stopped short of lifetime servitude or inherited status-the two attributes of true slavery-yet in other cases it included both. The Handlins' argument excludes the real possibility that Black people in the English colonies were never treated as the equals of White people.

This possibility has important ramifications. If from the outset Black people were discriminated against, then legal slavery should be viewed as a reflection and an extension of racial prejudice rather than, as many hIstorians including the Handlins have argued, the cause of prejudice. In addition, the existence of discrimination before the advent of legal slavery offers a further explanation for the harsher treatment of Black slaves in North than in South America. Freyre and Tannenbaum have rightly argued that the lack of certain traditions in North America-such as a Roman conception of slavery and a Roman Catholic emphasis on equality-explains why the treatment of Black slaves was more severe there than in the Spanish and Portuguese colonies of South America. But this cannot be the whole explanation since it is merely negative, based only on a lack of something. A more compelling explanation is that the early and sometimes extreme racial discrimination in the English colonies helped determine the particular nature of the slavery that followed.
21. Which of the following statements best describes the organization of the first paragraph of the passage?

(A) A historical trend is sketched and an exception to that trend is cited.
(B) Evidence for a historical irregularity is mentioned and a generalization from that evidence is advanced.
(C) A paradox about the origins of an institution is pointed out and the author's explanation of the paradox is expounded.
(D) A statement about a historical phenomenon is offered and a possible misinterpretation of that statement is addressed.
(E) An interpretation of the rise of an institution is stated and evidence for that interpretation is provided.

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
D


22. Which of the following is the most logical inference to be drawn from the passage about the effects of "several acts of the Maryland and Virginia legislatures" passed during and after the 1660's?

(A) The acts negatively affected the pre-1660's position of Black as well as of White servants.
(B) The acts had the effect of impairing rather than improving the position of White servants relative to what it had been before the 1660's.
(C) The acts had a different effect on the position of White servants than did many of the acts passed during this time by the legislatures of -other colonies.
(D) The acts, at the very least, caused the position of White servants to remain no better than it had been before the 1660's.
(E) The acts, at the very least, tended to reflect the attitudes toward Black servants that already existed before the 1660's.

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
D


23. With which of the following statements regarding the status of Black people in the English colonies of North America before the 1660's would the author be LEAST likely to agree?

(A) Although Black people were not legally considered to be slaves, they were often called slaves.
(B) Although subject to some discrimination, Black people had a higher legal status than they did after the 1660's.
(C) Although sometimes subject to lifetime servitude, Black people were not legally considered to be slaves.
(D) Although often not treated the same as White people, Black people, like many White people, possessed the legal status of servants.
(E) Although apparently subject to more discrimination after 1630 than before 1630, Black people from 1620 to the 1660's were legally considered to be servants.

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
A


24. According to the passage, the Handlins have argued which of the following about the relationship between racial prejudice and the institution of legal slavery in the English colonies of North America?

(A) Racial prejudice and the institution of slavery arose simultaneously.
(B) Racial prejudice most often took the forn of the imposition of inherited status, one of the attributes of slavery.
(C) The source of racial p(prejudice was the institution of slavery.
(D) Because of the influence of the Roman Catholic church, racial prejudice sometimes did not result in slavery.
(E) Although existing in a lesser forn before the 1660's, racial prejudice increased sharply after slavery was legalized.

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
C


25. The passage suggests that the existence of a Roman conception of slavery in Spanish and Portuguese colonies had the effect of

(A) extending rather than causing racial prejudice in these colonies
(B) hastening the legalization of slavery in these colonies
(C) mitigating some of the conditions of slavery for Black people in these colonies
(D) delaying the introduction of slavery into the English colonies
(E) bringing about an improvement in the treatment of Black slaves in the English colonies

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
C


26. The author considers the explanation put forward by Freyre and Tannenbaum for the treatment accorded Black slaves in the English colonies of North America to be

(A) ambitious but misguided
(B) valid but limited
(C) popular but suspect
(D) anachronistic and controversial
(E) premature and illogical

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
B


27. With which of the following statements regarding the reason for the introduction of legal slavery in the English colonies of North America would the author be most likely to agree?

(A) The introduction is partly to be explained by reference to the origins of slavery, before the 1660's, in the Spanish and Portuguese colonies.
(B) The introduction is to be explained by reference to a growing consensus beginning in the 1630's about what were the attributes of true slavery.
(C) The introduction is more likely to be explained by reference to a decline than to an improvement in the position of White servants in the colonies during and after the 1660's.
(D) The introduction is more likely to be explained by reference to the position of Black servants in the colonies in the 1630's than by reference to their position in the 1640's and 1650's.
(E) The introduction is more likely to be explained by reference to the history of Black people in the colonies l?efore 1660 than by reference to the improving position of White servants during and after the 1660's.

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
E


_________________

Need Practice? 20 Free GRE Quant Tests available for free with 20 Kudos
GRE Prep Club Members of the Month: Each member of the month will get three months free access of GRE Prep Club tests.

Intern
Intern
Joined: 12 Sep 2019
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 8

Re: The first mention of slavery in the statutes of the English [#permalink] New post 17 Sep 2019, 09:32
@Carcass Can you please post explanations for the answers?
Founder
Founder
User avatar
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 9652
Followers: 199

Kudos [?]: 2366 [0], given: 9155

CAT Tests
Re: The first mention of slavery in the statutes of the English [#permalink] New post 17 Sep 2019, 10:09
Expert's post
Sure :)

However, give me the time to write down. It is tough, seven questions and on top of that time-consuming.

Be patience, please.

Regards
_________________

Need Practice? 20 Free GRE Quant Tests available for free with 20 Kudos
GRE Prep Club Members of the Month: Each member of the month will get three months free access of GRE Prep Club tests.

Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Jan 2020
Posts: 55
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 40

CAT Tests
Re: The first mention of slavery in the statutes of the English [#permalink] New post 15 Jan 2020, 19:20
Please help explain the answers. I couldn't fully understand the passage. If you can summarize in an easy language, that would help tremendously
Founder
Founder
User avatar
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 9652
Followers: 199

Kudos [?]: 2366 [0], given: 9155

CAT Tests
Re: The first mention of slavery in the statutes of the English [#permalink] New post 15 Jan 2020, 19:30
Expert's post
Tomorrow, I will address it. :)

No worries
_________________

Need Practice? 20 Free GRE Quant Tests available for free with 20 Kudos
GRE Prep Club Members of the Month: Each member of the month will get three months free access of GRE Prep Club tests.

Intern
Intern
Joined: 02 Jun 2019
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: The first mention of slavery in the statutes of the English [#permalink] New post 11 Feb 2020, 06:29
Explanation ?
2 KUDOS received
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 03 Dec 2019
Posts: 163
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 130 [2] , given: 35

CAT Tests
Re: The first mention of slavery in the statutes of the English [#permalink] New post 12 Feb 2020, 11:40
2
This post received
KUDOS
21. Which of the following statements best describes the organization of the first paragraph of the passage?

(A) A historical trend is sketched and an exception to that trend is cited.
(B) Evidence for a historical irregularity is mentioned and a generalization from that evidence is advanced.
(C) A paradox about the origins of an institution is pointed out and the author's explanation of the paradox is expounded.
(D) A statement about a historical phenomenon is offered and a possible misinterpretation of that statement is addressed.
(E) An interpretation of the rise of an institution is stated and evidence for that interpretation is provided.


In the first para, the author states that the first mention of slavery happened much later than it had first actually came into inception. The author also pointed out that after Handlins' account of explanation of late introduction of slavery has some drawbacks, so a detailed analysis was needed. Hence, D is the answer.



22. Which of the following is the most logical inference to be drawn from the passage about the effects of "several acts of the Maryland and Virginia legislatures" passed during and after the 1660's?

(A) The acts negatively affected the pre-1660's position of Black as well as of White servants.
(B) The acts had the effect of impairing rather than improving the position of White servants relative to what it had been before the 1660's.
(C) The acts had a different effect on the position of White servants than did many of the acts passed during this time by the legislatures of -other colonies.
(D) The acts, at the very least, caused the position of White servants to remain no better than it had been before the 1660's.
(E) The acts, at the very least, tended to reflect the attitudes toward Black servants that already existed before the 1660's.


This line is highlighted in red. Handlins' failed to explain how the white servants were better off than the black servants during and after 1660's. This line is presenting an idea that is countering the idea mentioned in the preceding line. And by that it meant that these acts have somehow proved that the white servants positions were not improving like what Handlins had predicted.

This analysis brings our answer choices to be either B and D. This one is tricky. The "otherwise" indicates that these acts has proved that white servants position was no better than it had been before 1660's. Choice B says the acts had the "effect" of impairing the position rather than improving, but this is not enough. if something had an effect of causing X don't guarantee that X will happen. D is more definitive choice and it is our answer.




23. With which of the following statements regarding the status of Black people in the English colonies of North America before the 1660's would the author be LEAST likely to agree?

(A) Although Black people were not legally considered to be slaves, they were often called slaves.
(B) Although subject to some discrimination, Black people had a higher legal status than they did after the 1660's.
(C) Although sometimes subject to lifetime servitude, Black people were not legally considered to be slaves.
(D) Although often not treated the same as White people, Black people, like many White people, possessed the legal status of servants.
(E) Although apparently subject to more discrimination after 1630 than before 1630, Black people from 1620 to the 1660's were legally considered to be servants.


This one was probably the easiest of them all. "It is true that before the 1660's Black people were rarely called slaves" from para 2 settles the answer to be A.


24. According to the passage, the Handlins have argued which of the following about the relationship between racial prejudice and the institution of legal slavery in the English colonies of North America?

(A) Racial prejudice and the institution of slavery arose simultaneously.
(B) Racial prejudice most often took the forn of the imposition of inherited status, one of the attributes of slavery.
(C) The source of racial p(prejudice was the institution of slavery.
(D) Because of the influence of the Roman Catholic church, racial prejudice sometimes did not result in slavery.
(E) Although existing in a lesser forn before the 1660's, racial prejudice increased sharply after slavery was legalized.


Handlins argued that prejudice only occurred due to the introduction of slavery. This is mentioned in para 3 : "then legal slavery should be viewed as a reflection and an extension of racial prejudice rather than, as many hIstorians including the Handlins have argued, the cause of prejudice." C is the answer.


25. The passage suggests that the existence of a Roman conception of slavery in Spanish and Portuguese colonies had the effect of

(A) extending rather than causing racial prejudice in these colonies
(B) hastening the legalization of slavery in these colonies
(C) mitigating some of the conditions of slavery for Black people in these colonies
(D) delaying the introduction of slavery into the English colonies
(E) bringing about an improvement in the treatment of Black slaves in the English colonies


It is mentioned in the para 3 that slavery was more severe in North America than it was in Spanish and Portuguese colonies. And one of the possible explanations was the lack of roman conception and Catholic emphasis of equality in North America. Therefore, it can be inferred that these colonies had mitigated some of the conditions of slavery.


26. The author considers the explanation put forward by Freyre and Tannenbaum for the treatment accorded Black slaves in the English colonies of North America to be

(A) ambitious but misguided
(B) valid but limited
(C) popular but suspect
(D) anachronistic and controversial
(E) premature and illogical


In para 3, the author states: "But this cannot be the whole explanation since it is merely negative, based only on a lack of something". It means that the explanation is not necessarily wrong but limited. B is the answer.


27. With which of the following statements regarding the reason for the introduction of legal slavery in the English colonies of North America would the author be most likely to agree?

(A) The introduction is partly to be explained by reference to the origins of slavery, before the 1660's, in the Spanish and Portuguese colonies.
(B) The introduction is to be explained by reference to a growing consensus beginning in the 1630's about what were the attributes of true slavery.
(C) The introduction is more likely to be explained by reference to a decline than to an improvement in the position of White servants in the colonies during and after the 1660's.
(D) The introduction is more likely to be explained by reference to the position of Black servants in the colonies in the 1630's than by reference to their position in the 1640's and 1650's.
(E) The introduction is more likely to be explained by reference to the history of Black people in the colonies l?efore 1660 than by reference to the improving position of White servants during and after the 1660's.


The author discards Handlins view of contending that the position of white people was improving during and after the 1660's. He also asserts that the introduction of slavery in English colonies could be likely caused by densely rooted prejudice against black people. E correctly identifies the reason.
Re: The first mention of slavery in the statutes of the English   [#permalink] 12 Feb 2020, 11:40
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The first mention of slavery in the statutes of the English

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GRE Prep Club Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GRE Prep Club Rules| Contact

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group

Kindly note that the GRE® test is a registered trademark of the Educational Testing Service®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by ETS®.