Author 
Message 
TAGS:


Intern
Joined: 22 Aug 2016
Posts: 31
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 5

The 20 people at a party are divided into n mutually exclusi [#permalink]
24 Mar 2017, 14:48
Question Stats:
47% (01:15) correct
52% (00:54) wrong based on 53 sessions
The 20 people at a party are divided into n mutually exclusive groups in such a way that the number of people in any group does not exceed the number in any other group by more than 1.
Quantity A 
Quantity B 
The value of n if at least one of the groups consists of 3 people 
6 
A) Quantity A is greater. B) Quantity B is greater. C) The two quantities are equal. D) The relationship cannot be determined from the information given.
Last edited by Carcass on 14 Nov 2018, 13:18, edited 1 time in total.
Edited by Carcass




GRE Instructor
Joined: 10 Apr 2015
Posts: 2021
Followers: 62
Kudos [?]:
1836
[1]
, given: 9

Re: The 20 people at a party are divided into n mutually exclusi [#permalink]
24 Mar 2017, 15:32
1
This post received KUDOS
HarveyKlaus wrote: The 20 people at a party are divided into n mutually exclusive groups in such a way that the number of people in any group does not exceed the number in any other group by more than 1.
Quantity A: The value of n if at least one of the groups consists of 3 people Quantity B: 6 Let's first see what happens when n = 6 We could divide the 20 people into 6 groups as follows: 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4 So, n COULD equal 6. This means the correct answer is either C or D Are there other possible values of n that satisfy the given conditions? For example, can n = 7? Well, we could divide the 20 people into 7 groups as follows: 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 2 So, n COULD equal 7. This means the correct answer is Cheers, Brent
_________________
Brent Hanneson – Creator of greenlighttestprep.com Sign up for my free GRE Question of the Day emails



Director
Joined: 09 Nov 2018
Posts: 508
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
27
[0], given: 1

Re: The 20 people at a party are divided into n mutually exclusi [#permalink]
14 Nov 2018, 09:44
Is there any easy way?



Founder
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 7014
Followers: 117
Kudos [?]:
1369
[0], given: 6372

Re: The 20 people at a party are divided into n mutually exclusi [#permalink]
14 Nov 2018, 11:52
Brent showed you two approaches. I do not think there is one more. Regards
_________________
Get the 2 FREE GREPrepclub Tests



GRE Prep Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jun 2014
Posts: 4809
WE: Business Development (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 120
Kudos [?]:
1910
[0], given: 397

Re: The 20 people at a party are divided into n mutually exclusi [#permalink]
14 Nov 2018, 13:21
AE wrote: Is there any easy way? It is the same way as brent Take the number of groups as 2. Then you can have 10,10 split. So 2 is a possible solution. Take number of groups as 3. You can have 7, 7, 6 split also a possible solution. Take number 4 You can have 5, 5, 5, 5 Clearly all numbers below 6 are possible. Now if you look at 6 Split is 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4. Clearly the quanity A is less than quantity B is true and quantity A = quantity B is also true. Hence D
_________________
Sandy If you found this post useful, please let me know by pressing the Kudos Button
Try our free Online GRE Test



Supreme Moderator
Joined: 01 Nov 2017
Posts: 370
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
112
[0], given: 4

Re: The 20 people at a party are divided into n mutually exclusi [#permalink]
14 Nov 2018, 18:38
HarveyKlaus wrote: The 20 people at a party are divided into n mutually exclusive groups in such a way that the number of people in any group does not exceed the number in any other group by more than 1.
Quantity A 
Quantity B 
The value of n if at least one of the groups consists of 3 people 
6 
A) Quantity A is greater. B) Quantity B is greater. C) The two quantities are equal. D) The relationship cannot be determined from the information given. Question is basically asking us to distribute 20 into groups with each having a difference of max 1 with another. What does it tell us that all the groups will have the strength within two consecutive numbers for example x and x+1.Now they have given a value as 3, so different ways it can have is  a combinations of 2 and 3, or a combinations of 3 and 4. 1) Max possible value of nwhen most of them have 2. since one of them has 3 => so 203=17 left. Now we cannot have all of them as 2 since we will be left with 172*8=1 in the end and we cannot have 1.. It has to be only 2 and 3 so another group will have 3, 173=14.. the remaining 14 can be divided in 14/2 = 7 group so MAX is 1+1+7=9.....Here A>B 2) Min possible value of nwhen most of them have 4. since one of them has 3 => so 203=17 left. Now we cannot have all of them as 4 since we will be left with 174*4=1 in the end and we cannot have 1.. It has to be only 4 and 3 so another group will have 3, 173=14 but again 14 is not divisible by 4. Hence two more group will have 3 members => 4 group of 3 each = 4*3=12.. the remaining 2012=8 can be divided in 8/4 = 2 groups so MIN is 4+2=6..... here A=B therefore we can have different answers D
_________________
Some useful Theory. 1. Arithmetic and Geometric progressions : https://greprepclub.com/forum/progressionsarithmeticgeometricandharmonic11574.html#p27048 2. Effect of Arithmetic Operations on fraction : https://greprepclub.com/forum/effectsofarithmeticoperationsonfractions11573.html?sid=d570445335a783891cd4d48a17db9825 3. Remainders : https://greprepclub.com/forum/remainderswhatyoushouldknow11524.html 4. Number properties : https://greprepclub.com/forum/numberpropertyallyourequire11518.html 5. Absolute Modulus and Inequalities : https://greprepclub.com/forum/absolutemodulusabetterunderstanding11281.html



Manager
Joined: 22 Feb 2018
Posts: 163
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
115
[0], given: 22

Re: The 20 people at a party are divided into n mutually exclusi [#permalink]
14 Nov 2018, 21:33
answer: D At least number of people in a group is 3, considering the constraint in the question that no group number can be more than 1 different from any other group number, the group members can be just in groups of 3,4 or 3,2. We write the possible combination of 2and3 & 3and4 which equal 20: 3*2 + 2*7 = 20 (9 groups) 3*4 + 2*4 = 20. (8 groups) 3*6 +2 = 20 (7 groups) (There can’t be odd number of 3, because then we can’t have 20) 3*4 + 4*2. (6 groups) So n can be 6,7,8 or 9, the answer is D.
_________________
Follow your heart



Intern
Joined: 07 Aug 2016
Posts: 42
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
16
[0], given: 0

Re: The 20 people at a party are divided into n mutually exclusi [#permalink]
20 Nov 2018, 08:03
HarveyKlaus wrote: The 20 people at a party are divided into n mutually exclusive groups in such a way that the number of people in any group does not exceed the number in any other group by more than 1.
Quantity A 
Quantity B 
The value of n if at least one of the groups consists of 3 people 
6 
A) Quantity A is greater. B) Quantity B is greater. C) The two quantities are equal. D) The relationship cannot be determined from the information given. It doesn't say that the group number is distinct. So we can safely assume it could be repetitive. One option is 2,3,4,5,6 the sum will be 20. Number of groups 5. If we have 3,3,3,3,4,4 = 12 + 8 = 20 we have 6 groups. We could also have it 3,3,3,3,3,3,2 = 3*6 + 2 = 20. 7 groups. Since we have different answers it is D.




Re: The 20 people at a party are divided into n mutually exclusi
[#permalink]
20 Nov 2018, 08:03





