It is currently 31 Oct 2020, 10:54
My Tests


GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance


we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

[Review Request] Praise Positives

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
1 KUDOS received
Joined: 23 Jul 2017
Posts: 8
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [1] , given: 0

[Review Request] Praise Positives [#permalink] New post 26 Jul 2017, 14:44
This post received
The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

A large discussion that tends to take place between generations is the sturdiness of prior generations. "The Greatest Generation" is known for being tough and no-nonsense, often supplanting their own desires and needs to partake in a war or provide for their families. In contrast, the newest generation of adults is often looked at with disdain for lauding seemingly insignificant feats. In rearing and teaching children, adolescents and even adults alike, there tends to be a dichotomy between methodology. One school of though asserts that "tough love" is the way to assure that children are hardy and able to navigate through a cruel world. On the other hand stand proponents of a gentler touch that are adamant that positive actions be praised. Though there are pros and cons to both, the best course of action is in the middle where benefits of both are accessible. In the middle, confidence is nurtured appropriately, and criticism can be cultivated not just for the individual's nuanced thought processes but for society as a whole.

Many parents start out thinking that if they are too harsh, they can destroy the self-esteem of their children. Though harsh criticism with unrelenting negativity can adversely affect the psyche and confidence of an impressionable child, there is a middle ground to be had between complete indulgence and acerbic denial. Confidence needs to be built on appropriately. Though negativity and rejection are difficult matters to deal with, especially for young people, there are harsh realities that young people need to learn to be tempered to. Young people can not be sheltered in ignorance forever.

There is a saying, "In criticizing, the teach is hoping to teach. That is all." With criticism, a person is has the capacity of be aware of his or her limitations or the true ramifications of an action. Acknowledgment of both positive and negative actions allows for the development of critical thinking skills in children. With encouragement of positive activities, students can assume that a certain course of actions does work to create a desired effect. On the other hand, allowing this very same student to know that a different course of action is not the best solution allows for the pupil to assess the differences between the two tactics.

Also, the criticism can ultimately benefit others. Particularly in the scientific and healthcare fields, wrong solutions are just as important as helpful ones. There are few explicitly "right" or "wrong" answers because the world is a nuanced and complicated place with multiple variables that are often cryptic until a study shows its effect. In the face of such a gradient, acknowledging progress and failure are important as lightposts to stop and evaluate which way to go.

In conclusion, positive and negative actions are both equally important. A balanced perspective is important in bolstering positive actions but not completely repudiating the value of negative ones. Criticism in itself allow for thoughtful interpretation of differences between successful and unsuccessful solutions. In science, this pivoting allows for navigation in an often vexing world where sometimes there is no clear right answer.

-- Thank you for your time!
Joined: 17 Apr 2018
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: seeking Review [#permalink] New post 04 Jul 2018, 07:49
Life is a long journey and the best teacher .Every action positive or negative leaves a lesson to be learnt for individuals. Teachers and parents highlight a particular trait of actions to impart experiential reform or learnings in their kids. The thesis that best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones is lacks reasoning and is stretched too far for one sided view of situation. The move could prove detrimental rather than the best way to teach not only in at once but also in long term.

I disagree with the thesis mentioned as a general statement because for a holistic teaching both actions should be assessed equally. Negative actions could do more harm to an individual then good in long term. Imagine a situation where a sportsperson performs very well before the Olympics and gets the appreciation from coach and team, but the player is taking help of drugs. In this case one cannot condone the negative action because this could jeopardize not only his present game but complete ban on his sports career.

Also, Negative actions are one that sneaks inside an individual very quickly; if the actions are not addressed properly it could be very hard to wipe it out from a person in later phases. Negative actions should be immediately highlighted followed by counselling and monitoring. Success and prosperity in one’s life is contingent on thriving positive actions and countering negative ones. Rulers and dynasties that couldn’t sustain were one that despite embracing expansion and maintaining skilled military thrived on atrocities.

In conclusion, favouring positive habits and actions while overlooking negative actions would make an individual arrogant and over confident. This way of teaching would impart conceit in place of self realization. I am not suggesting that one shouldn’t encourage positive habits and actions but one mustn’t disregard negative habits
Re: seeking Review   [#permalink] 04 Jul 2018, 07:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by

[Review Request] Praise Positives

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GRE Prep Club Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GRE Prep Club Rules| Contact

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group

Kindly note that the GRE® test is a registered trademark of the Educational Testing Service®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by ETS®.