It is currently 28 May 2020, 11:12

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Many researchers have chipped away at the edges of Vera‘s ar

 Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:
Founder
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 11174
Followers: 238

Kudos [?]: 2785 [1] , given: 10623

Many researchers have chipped away at the edges of Vera‘s ar [#permalink]  02 Dec 2019, 10:25
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
00:00

Question Stats:

9% (01:05) correct 90% (01:14) wrong based on 21 sessions
Many researchers have chipped away at the edges of Vera‘s argument, (i) ______ his take on the data or his interpretation of historical documents. But no one has directly (ii) ______ the heart of his argument: that we have wildly underestimated the impact that animals, especially large ones, had on the environment. Even Vera‘s critics say they appreciate the debate he has stirred up, if only because it has made them (iii) ______ their convictions.

Blank (i) Blank (ii) Blank (iii)
embracing confronted reaffirm
quibbling with supported reexamine
deliberately overlooking apprehended revivify

Kudos for the right answer and explanation
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Need Practice? 20 Free GRE Quant Tests available for free with 20 Kudos
GRE Prep Club Members of the Month: Each member of the month will get three months free access of GRE Prep Club tests.

Moderator
Joined: 05 Oct 2019
Posts: 100
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 110 [1] , given: 56

Re: Many researchers have chipped away at the edges of Vera‘s ar [#permalink]  03 Dec 2019, 16:43
1
This post received
KUDOS
Many researchers have chipped away at the edges of Vera‘s argument, (i) ______ his take on the data or his interpretation of historical documents. But no one has directly (ii) ______ the heart of his argument: that we have wildly underestimated the impact that animals, especially large ones, had on the environment. Even Vera‘s critics say they appreciate the debate he has stirred up, if only because it has made them (iii) ______ their convictions.

Blank (i):
Clues are - "many researchers chipped away" at Vera's argument -> indicating some kind of "attack"
->"quibbling with"

Blank (ii):
Clue - "but" indicating opposite direction. Earlier they were attacking, it now they seem to accept some part of his argument, which is backed by the remainder of the sentence -"that we..."
Also be careful of "no one" -> basically no one argued with him on this front. So though there was a change in the flow, due to the appearance of "no one" we are looking for a word with negative connotation

indicating "confronted" ("supported" - opposite to what we need, "apprehended" meaning understood -> again opposite ...these would have made sense had there been "everyone" instead of "no one")

Blank (iii)
These arguments have initiated some kind of trigger that is making them revisit, analyze their convictions. All options are positive and very close to each other. "revivify" and "reaffirm" are quite strong words, but we dont have any indication that Vera's argument was so strong that these critics would be proselytized.
"reexamine" is the best fist - where the argument is just a trigger for them to revisit their convictions
Re: Many researchers have chipped away at the edges of Vera‘s ar   [#permalink] 03 Dec 2019, 16:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Many researchers have chipped away at the edges of Vera‘s ar

 Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group Kindly note that the GRE® test is a registered trademark of the Educational Testing Service®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by ETS®.