It is currently 10 Dec 2018, 12:50
My Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 5126
Followers: 76

Kudos [?]: 1028 [1] , given: 4631

CAT Tests
Extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest [#permalink] New post 23 Feb 2017, 08:39
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
00:00

Question Stats:

29% (00:54) correct 70% (01:27) wrong based on 72 sessions


Extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest, the habitat of a large population of deer. Because deer feed at the edges of forests, these deer will be attracted to the spaces alongside the new roads being cut through Pataska Forest to serve the new residential areas. Consequently, once the housing is occupied, the annual number of the forest's deer hit by cars will be much higher than before construction started.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A) The number of deer hit by commercial vehicles will not increase significantly when the housing is occupied.
B) Deer will be as attracted to the forest edge around new houses as to the forest edge alongside roads.
C) In years past, the annual number of deer that have been hit by cars on existing roads through Pataska Forest has been very low.
D) The development will leave sufficient forest to sustain a significant population of deer.
E) No deer hunting will be allowed in Pataska Forest when the housing is occupied.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Get the 2 FREE GREPrepclub Tests

3 KUDOS received
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 5126
Followers: 76

Kudos [?]: 1028 [3] , given: 4631

CAT Tests
Re: Extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest [#permalink] New post 07 Mar 2017, 02:40
3
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
Explanation

Tough question.

Actually, the stem suggests us that a new road alongside the forest will be constructing to serve a certain new resident area. The assumption is that nothing will happen to reduce the deer population consistently that the road will jeopardize the deer population itself.

D wins
_________________

Get the 2 FREE GREPrepclub Tests

Intern
Intern
Joined: 26 May 2017
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 20

Re: Extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest [#permalink] New post 27 Jun 2017, 04:26
i did not understand what you mean in the explanation please elaborate, my answer to this question is "b"
1 KUDOS received
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 5126
Followers: 76

Kudos [?]: 1028 [1] , given: 4631

CAT Tests
Re: Extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest [#permalink] New post 29 Jun 2017, 02:08
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
The argument supposes that the deer will feed at the edge of the new road because the road itself is gooing to diminish the space of the forest.

The assumption on which the argument relies is just this: if the road in its construction will leave sufficient forest and as a consequence space for the deer to feed, then they will not be in danger.

Hope this helps
_________________

Get the 2 FREE GREPrepclub Tests

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
Joined: 09 Mar 2018
Posts: 11
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 17 [1] , given: 0

Re: Extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest [#permalink] New post 12 Apr 2018, 13:07
1
This post received
KUDOS
To put this a different way:

The author of the passage is worried about more deer (a greater number of deer) getting hit after construction, because there will be many more chances for deer to get hit. After all, they'll be eating by the edge of the roads.

This is a logical worry for the author. We need to accept that. However, it only holds true if there are more deer to be hit. If all the deer leave, then the worry does not apply.

That's why the answer is D.
_________________

The best way to study for the GRE is through an error log.

Check out this GRE error log on Google Sheets.

It's created by Trevor Klee, Tutor, a top rated, 99th percentile scoring GRE tutor, available for in-person (Boston-based) and remote tutoring.

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 23 Apr 2018
Posts: 67
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 5

Re: Extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest [#permalink] New post 29 Apr 2018, 11:59
By negating the assumption : The development will not leave sufficient forest to sustain a significant population of deer.
I dont think that this negated assumption breaks the given conclusion.
@trevorkleetutor or @carcass
Your opinions?
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 5126
Followers: 76

Kudos [?]: 1028 [0], given: 4631

CAT Tests
Re: Extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest [#permalink] New post 29 Apr 2018, 14:04
Expert's post
Not enough space will not permit to the deer population to be sufficient. So, the hits by car will not as much high as before. The conclusion falls apart.

It works.

Regards
_________________

Get the 2 FREE GREPrepclub Tests

Intern
Intern
Joined: 02 Apr 2018
Posts: 9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 3

Re: Extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest [#permalink] New post 30 Apr 2018, 01:43
The argument says that the dear population will decrease and the assumption that validates it is that the deer’s will be attracted to these roads.
Kindly correct if It’s wrong.
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 5126
Followers: 76

Kudos [?]: 1028 [0], given: 4631

CAT Tests
Re: Extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest [#permalink] New post 30 Apr 2018, 04:23
Expert's post
Vivek13791 wrote:
The argument says that the dear population will decrease and the assumption that validates it is that the deer’s will be attracted to these roads.
Kindly correct if It’s wrong.



They will be attracted only if we do have enough number of deer, otherwise what will be attracted ?? nothing.

Also a video from magoosh that confirms what I am saying


Regards
_________________

Get the 2 FREE GREPrepclub Tests

Intern
Intern
Joined: 12 Mar 2018
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 6

Re: Extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest [#permalink] New post 07 May 2018, 23:41
In this question, do we need to find out strengthen or weaken assumption? I am not getting the question. Please explain?
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 5126
Followers: 76

Kudos [?]: 1028 [0], given: 4631

CAT Tests
Re: Extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest [#permalink] New post 08 May 2018, 12:32
Expert's post
it does not exist a weak assumption or a strong assumption. There is only THE assumption that is the unstated premise that ties the argument (made of facts mainly) and the conclusion of the argument (usually the last sentence of the stimulus but not always)

The assumption is a sort of a bridge.

Ask if something is unclear to you.

Regards
_________________

Get the 2 FREE GREPrepclub Tests

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
Joined: 17 May 2018
Posts: 13
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [1] , given: 2

Re: Extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest [#permalink] New post 27 Jun 2018, 20:30
1
This post received
KUDOS
Here it is asking for the assumption for which the argument(the annual number of the forest's deer hit by cars will be much higher than before construction started) is depend.
And that assumption is that "deer will be attracted to the spaces alongside the new roads".
So for me, the answer is B
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Jun 2018
Posts: 14
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [1] , given: 12

Re: Extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest [#permalink] New post 30 Jun 2018, 01:36
1
This post received
KUDOS
vij5 wrote:
In this question, do we need to find out strengthen or weaken assumption? I am not getting the question. Please explain?

No its assumption question... "On what basis does this argument stands?"
Intern
Intern
Joined: 18 Sep 2018
Posts: 38
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 1

Re: Extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest [#permalink] New post 13 Nov 2018, 21:49
Quote:
This is a logical worry for the author. We need to accept that. However, it only holds true if there are more deer to be hit. If all the deer leave, then the worry does not apply.

That's why the answer is D.


True. Plus, it's the only one that cannot be refuted by the text.

This one was really tough!
Intern
Intern
Joined: 01 Dec 2018
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

Re: Extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest [#permalink] New post 03 Dec 2018, 08:02
this one is so tough it took me quite a while to get the explanation tho
Re: Extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest   [#permalink] 03 Dec 2018, 08:02
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GRE Prep Club Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GRE Prep Club Rules| Contact

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group

Kindly note that the GRE® test is a registered trademark of the Educational Testing Service®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by ETS®.