 It is currently 15 Jul 2019, 14:36 ### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

#### Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here. # A question about Math conventions on GRE  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Intern Joined: 27 Jan 2019
Posts: 24
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 19 , given: 3

HI

Can someone please explain the highlighted part in the following?

If r, s, and t are integers and then rs = t, r and s are factors, or divisors, of t; also, t is a multiple of r (and of s) and t is divisible by r (and by s). The factors of an integer include positive and negative integers. For example, −7 is a factor of 35, 8 is a factor of -40 and the integer 4 has six factors: -4,-2,-1,1, 2, and 4. The terms factor, divisor, and divisible are used only when r, s, and t are integers. However, the term multiple can be used with any real numbers s and t provided r is an integer. For example, 1.2 is a multiple of 0.4, and is a −2π is a multiple of π.

Thanks Manager Joined: 04 Feb 2019
Posts: 204
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 110  , given: 0

2
KUDOS
Expert's post
Hey there!

What you need to know here are that the terms "factor," "divisor," and "divisible" only apply to integers. Otherwise, there would be an infinite number of factors for every number.

So, 10 is a factor of 100, because 10(10) = 100. Everything is an integer. 100 is divisible by 10, and 10 is a divisor of 100.

However, 8 is not a factor of 100, even though 8(12.5) = 100. In that case, 12.5 is not an integer, so that throws everything off. When we're talking about factors, divisible, and divisors, everything must be an integer.

9.2, then, is not divisible by anything, and is not a factor of anything, and does not have any divisors.

However, 9.2 is a multiple of 4.6. This is because 2(4.6) = 9.2. This means that the term multiple is a bit more flexible. It can be applied to non-integers so long as one of the numbers being multiplied is an integer.

The number 4.84 is not a multiple of 2.2, because 2.2(2.2) = 4.84. Neither of the numbers being multiplied are integers, so 4.84 is not a multiple.

But 4.4 is a multiple of 2.2, because 2(2.2) = 4.4. Since one of the numbers being multiplied is an integer, 4.4 is a multiple of the other one.

Does that make sense? Director Joined: 20 Apr 2016
Posts: 948
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 701  , given: 152

1
KUDOS
fifan wrote:
HI

Can someone please explain the highlighted part in the following?

If r, s, and t are integers and then rs = t, r and s are factors, or divisors, of t; also, t is a multiple of r (and of s) and t is divisible by r (and by s). The factors of an integer include positive and negative integers. For example, −7 is a factor of 35, 8 is a factor of -40 and the integer 4 has six factors: -4,-2,-1,1, 2, and 4. The terms factor, divisor, and divisible are used only when r, s, and t are integers. However, the term multiple can be used with any real numbers s and t provided r is an integer. For example, 1.2 is a multiple of 0.4, and is a −2π is a multiple of π.

Thanks

Hi welcome on the forum.

It's good that you are able to get ur doubts cleared,

BUT there are certain rules to follow before posting : https://greprepclub.com/forum/rules-for ... -1083.html

Read and make use of the forum, so that whole group is benefited.
_________________

If you found this post useful, please let me know by pressing the Kudos Button

Rules for Posting https://greprepclub.com/forum/rules-for ... -1083.html Target Test Prep Representative Joined: 12 Sep 2018
Posts: 149
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 102  , given: 0

1
KUDOS
Expert's post
Referring one non-integer number a multiple of another non-integer number is not commonly accepted. In the literature, one may frequently encounter the phrase "integer multiple" or if what is meant is clear from the context, you may see an expression like "multiples of π" (for instance, if you are talking about values of x that satisfy the equation cos y = cos (x + y) for every y); however, I haven't come across any text where numbers such as 4.4, 6.6, 8.8 etc. are referred to as "multiples of 2.2" instead of "integer multiples of 2.2". The reason for this is simple: once your set is large enough to contain rational numbers, any number becomes a multiple of any other number. For instance, 2 is a multiple of 3 (because 3 x 2/3 = 2) and 3 is a multiple of 2 (because 2 x 3/2 = 3). When every number is a multiple of every other number, it makes no sense to use that phrase.
_________________

# Scott Woodbury-Stewart

Founder and CEO

Scott@TargetTestPrep.com

See why Target Test Prep is the top rated GRE quant course on GRE Prep Club. Read Our Reviews

Intern Joined: 14 Nov 2018
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 , given: 0

Thanks for the info. Re: A question about Math conventions on GRE   [#permalink] 27 Feb 2019, 05:16
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# A question about Math conventions on GRE  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group Kindly note that the GRE® test is a registered trademark of the Educational Testing Service®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by ETS®.