It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 01:27
My Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Microfiber synthetics have been taking the place of natural

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 2089
Followers: 29

Kudos [?]: 308 [0], given: 1256

Microfiber synthetics have been taking the place of natural [#permalink] New post 26 May 2017, 02:08
Expert's post
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions


Microfiber synthetics have been taking the place of natural fibers in an ever-increasing number of clothes because they provide the same durability and deplete fewer natural resources. A shirt made of microfiber synthetics is, however, three times as expensive to produce as a natural-fiber shirt. It follows that the substitution of microfiber synthetic clothes for natural-fiber clothes is, at this time, not recommended from a financial standpoint.

Which of the following statements, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A) A microfiber synthetic shirt costs one-half the price of a natural-fiber shirt to maintain.

B) The production of microfiber synthetic clothes necessitates garment factories to renovate obsolete machinery and to hire extra workers to operate the new machines.

C) The upkeep of natural-fiber shirts is far less expensive than the upkeep of any other natural fiber garment in current production.

D) While producers anticipate that the cost of microfiber synthetics will remain stable, they recognize that the advent of recycling programs for natural fibers should bring down the costs of natural fibers.

E) The cost of providing stain guards for microfiber synthetic shirts would probably be greater than what garment producers now spend on stain guards for natural-fiber shirts.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Get the 17 FREE GREPrepclub Tests

Intern
Intern
Joined: 09 Jul 2016
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: Microfiber synthetics have been taking the place of natural [#permalink] New post 29 May 2017, 06:02
Please explain
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 2089
Followers: 29

Kudos [?]: 308 [0], given: 1256

Re: Microfiber synthetics have been taking the place of natural [#permalink] New post 29 May 2017, 06:18
Expert's post
Even if the synthetic one is more expensive to produce than the natural shirt one. However, the sell price is one half. Therefore, the quantity the firm is gong to sell is greater than the selling of the natural shirt.

So from a financial standing point is financial sound to produce them

A is the best. The rest are out of scope.

Hope this helps.

regards
_________________

Get the 17 FREE GREPrepclub Tests

Re: Microfiber synthetics have been taking the place of natural   [#permalink] 29 May 2017, 06:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Microfiber synthetics have been taking the place of natural

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GRE Prep Club Forum Home| About| Terms of Use| GRE Prep Club Rules| Contact

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group

Kindly note that the GRE® test is a registered trademark of the Educational Testing Service®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by ETS®.